Should tourists visit Peru’s Incan ruins?

Machu Picchu, Peru

Peru has always held an enormous fascination for me and climbing Machu Picchu has long been on my list of things to do. But archaeologists are warning that Peru’s Incan ruins, including Machu Picchu, are straining under a tourist boom.

For a long time, travelling to Peru was complicated by the continuing struggle with the Maoist Shining Path rebels. But now it’s become the hot new destination with everyone from Cameron Diaz to Princess Beatrice visiting in the past year. In 1992, just 9,000 people visited Machu Picchu; last year it was 700,000. A former culture ministry official has said: “If we open up Machu Picchu to more tourism, the place will be destroyed within 10 years.”

The authorities have tried to limit the numbers on the hiking trail but now that means that there is a huge increase in tourists going to other ancient sites, such as Choquequirao, the partially excavated sister city to Machu Picchu, and that’s also a problem.

It makes me so sad to hear about the damage caused to our priceless historical and wilderness treasures by irresponsible tourism. I believe litter is a big problem on the slopes of Mount Everest as well. And in the Arctic, I saw lots of bits of plastic, not from tourists but washed into the Arctic Ocean from the Atlantic coasts off Europe and North America.

This makes me think twice about going to Machu Picchu. If I ever do go, I’ll be sure to book with a reputable operator that ensures benefit for the local people and good environmental practices. A site such as Responsible Travel can help me find the right one. I would also consider a volunteer vacation to ensure I’m part of the solution, not the problem.

What do you think is the solution? Should tourists stop going to Peru’s Incan sites? Should the government heavily restrict it? Already Machu Picchu is closed to hikers in February while they clean up all the garbage discarded by hikers over the previous year. I think there needs to be a wider cultural change, not just a cap on numbers.

***

Photograph by szeke (busy) on Flickr, reproduced under a Creative Commons licence.

Related posts:

Comments

  1. The February closure is also used to repair parts of the trail and limit erosion. If hikers act responsibly and follow the guidelines then things should be ok. It’s a privilege to see Machu Picchu and should be treated as such.

    It’s true that there is repair work done every February. However, it is also true that there has been degradation to the trails and the site since the advent of mass tourism and there are questions about sustainability. I encourage readers to do their own research and make their own decisions about whether to go and what tour operators to use. – Caitlin.
    Adventure King“s last [type] ..Inca Trail To Machu Picchu- Interested

Trackbacks

  1. [...] planning their annual holidays, or weekend trips or activities closer to home. I also want to provoke thought about travel issues and this planet we live on. Meanwhile, perhaps I can provide travel of the [...]

  2. [...] Should tourists visit Peru’s Incan ruins? The ethics of a trip to Machu Picchu. This post is from 2007 but resurged in popularity thanks to [...]

  3. [...] pity because while tourism can be hugely destructive to some natural and historical wonders – Machu Picchu in Peru, for example – this project seemed to be doing everything right in terms of limiting tourism numbers and [...]

  4. [...] Should tourists visit Peru’s Incan ruins? (Roaming Tales) [...]

  5. [...] the same in Peru, where the Incan ruins of Macchu Picchu are straining under the weight of too many [...]

Bad Behavior has blocked 824 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Switch to our mobile site